by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Aug 11, 2010 11:11PM （转自性艾）
by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Aug 11, 2010 11:11PMWelcome to the forum, and aloha.(This reply originates from my place at Poipu Beach, Kaua'i.)Directly to your questions.
1) It is correct that more recent research has suggested a higher proportion of false negatives with rapid testing than previously realized.My recollection is that it's around 15%, i.e. meaning a negative result remains at least 85% reliable.However, the newer studies were rather small, and there is a large margin of error.To my knowledge the exact reasons are not known.However, false negative results do not occur repeatedly in the same person; so two negative results with rapid tests is virtually 100% reliable.
2) The window period ("time line") is about the same for the lab-based and rapid tests. 8 weeks usually is conclusive.
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV-Prevention/Re-HIV-Testing-Clarification/show/1315890
早期85%的准确率。但8周就和联酶差不多了。（好象仙翁也是这个观点，向仙翁致敬） 你去性艾啊！来这儿干吗？既然觉得这不好还来干吗呢？
页:
[1]
